You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Become a Fellow
ACP offers a number of resources to help members make sense of the MOC requirements and earn points.
Understanding MOC Requirements
Earn MOC points
The most comprehensive meeting in Internal Medicine.
April 11-13, 2019
Internal Medicine Meeting 2019
Prepare for the Certification and Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
Exam with an ACP review course.
Board Certification Review Courses
MOC Exam Prep Courses
Treating a patient? Researching a topic? Get answers now.
Visit AnnalsLearn More
Visit MKSAP 18Learn More
Visit DynaMed Plus
Ensure payment and avoid policy violations. Plus, new resources to help you navigate the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA).
Access helpful forms developed by a variety of sources for patient charts, logs, information sheets, office signs, and use by practice administration.
ACP advocates on behalf on internists and their patients on a number of timely issues. Learn about where ACP stands on the following areas:
© Copyright 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved. 190 North Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572
Toll Free: (800) 523.1546 · Local: (215) 351.2400
Christian Mateo Garcia MSIII, UNM SOM Amanda Bustamante-Provencio MSIII, UNM SOM Justin-James
Roesch M.D., FACP Department of Hospital Medicine, UNM SOM
Introduction: The cost of failure and repeating a single year of medical education can be upwards
of $100,000. There can be additional psychological ramifications for students, and
ancillary costs incurred by the institution. Peer-to-peer tutoring is a highly effective
means of augmenting learning and possibly preventing course failure in undergraduate
medical education. Peer-to-peer learning can reduce perceived power differentials
and create a lower-stakes learning environment, while augmenting learning of tutor
and tutee. Here we review pilot data from an all-volunteer, novel peer-to-peer tutoring
program created to reduce block failure rates at a state medical school.
Methods: A total of 31 students were tutees, 10 from the class of 2018 (MS2018), 15 from the
class of 2019 (MS2019) and 6 from the class of 2020 (MS2020). Students required assistance
or remediation in multiple different blocks across the curriculum. New peer-to-peer
pairings were made for every course. Volunteer tutors were verified to be achieving
85% or higher in their tutoring course and self-identified following email solicitation.
Tutees self-identified interest in the program and then self-selected tutors by picking
their top three choices, with the majority of students receiving their first choice.
Once selected, the pair was connected via email and met at a time and duration that
best suited their schedules. Tutees studying over the winter holiday break for remedial
examinations were paired with two to three tutors to ensure tutor availability.
Results: Neuroscience MS 2019, had 4 /4 tutees pass, 100%. Cardiovascular/Pulmonary/Renal MS
2019 had 5/6 pass, 83%. MS2018 and MS 2019 Infectious Disease had 5/6 and 1/1 pass,
or 83% and 100% respectively. GINME and ID remediation exams MS2018 had 3/4 pass,
75%. HSR remediation exam for MS2019 had 1/1 or 100% pass rate. The total program
pass rate (for students originally identified as being at risk of failing) is 82.8%
Discussion: We consider these rates to be highly successful based on the minimal costs and the
high success rate. The program was run without monetary support from the SOM, and
was felt to enhance the learning of both tutors and tutees. While data is limited
by a small N value in terms of success rates, we believe this pilot model could serve
as a highly effective prophylactic remediation effort for students to avoid the effects
of having to remediate a block or year, as well as incur the financial and psychosocial
impact of block failure. We hope that based on the initial success of this program,
this program might be more widely adopted across the school of medicine curriculum
as a means of promoting self-efficacy in learning and improving block passage rates
during the first two years of medical school.
Want to have your abstract featured here? ACP holds a National Abstracts Competition
as part of the ACP Internal Medicine Meeting every year. Find out more at ACP Online.
Back to the July 2017 issue of ACP IMpact