You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

You are using an outdated browser.

To ensure optimal security, this website will soon be unavailable on this browser. Please upgrade your browser to allow continued use of ACP websites.

You are here

Implementation of a Medical Student-Led Emergency Absentee Ballot Voting Initiative at an Urban Tertiary Care University Hospital

Authors

Kathryn Linder, BS1#, Alisha Maity, BA1#, Madeleine Becker, MD2, Gregory Kane, MD3, 1Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 2Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA , 3Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

Introduction

Medical and allied health professionals are in a unique position to advocate for vulnerable patients. Students at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH) launched an emergency absentee ballot voting initiative for the 2018 election, affording hospitalized patients (and their family members/support persons) the opportunity to vote despite acute hospitalization. This program sought to enable voting by absentee ballot for those with unexpected hospital confinement and absence from voting municipalities after the absentee ballot deadline passed. Recently, other medical institutions enacted nonpartisan voter registration and ballot activities in residency clinics, through hospital volunteer services, or with support of attorneys and law students. Our inaugural program, in contrast, was successfully initiated and led by undergraduate medical trainees.

Methods

Over the week before Election Day 2018, our interdisciplinary team of 50 medical student volunteers visited patients and caregivers at TJUH, assessing their interest in bedside voting via emergency absentee ballots. Hospital staff also directed volunteers to interested patients. We serviced Pennsylvania registered voters in Philadelphia County and neighboring Delaware, Montgomery, and Bucks Counties. The effort was nonpartisan; candidate or party-specific materials were strictly prohibited. Both a notary public and a physician were required for this process. A notarized affidavit was generated for each interested constituent, and physician sign-off affirmed hospitalization as the reason for an inability to vote in person. We submitted notarized absentee ballot applications to the Board of Elections (BoE). Ballots were issued upon application approval. Student volunteers distributed ballots to patients and aided in their completion by providing instructions, and reading text aloud, if necessary. Students collected and returned ballots to appropriate county election offices before the statutory deadline. HIPAA-compliance was assured using a spreadsheet tracking participants' room locations and stages within the application process.

Results

During the statewide timeframe, students visited over 500 patient rooms throughout our academic urban hospital. In total, our team submitted 92 ballots primarily to the Philadelphia County BoE in addition to three surrounding counties. All eligible individuals would likely have been otherwise unable to vote during these midterm elections. Responses from patients and their families, house staff and hospital personnel were overwhelmingly positive.

Conclusion

Hospitalized patients may not anticipate needing absentee ballots on Election Day. A medical student-driven hospital-wide voting initiative assisted inpatients in voting via emergency absentee ballots; such a program integrated civic engagement in patient care. Our program could be replicated at other academic centers with hospital support and student leadership. A key resource is access to certified notaries so that ballot applications can be authenticated. Many states have voting provisions allowing those hospitalized to participate; however, widespread education about state-specific requirements is necessary. Well-organized emergency absentee ballot voting programs promoted in hospitals can allow vulnerable hospitalized patients to vote in local and national elections.

References

  • Couture J, Breux S. The differentiated effects of health on political participation. Eur J Public Health. 2017; 27(4):599-604. [PMID: 28108593]
  • Gollust SE, Rahn WM. The Bodies Politic: Chronic Health Conditions and Voter Turnout in the 2008 Election. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015; 40(6):1115-55. [PMID: 26447024]
  • Gruen RL, Campbell EG, Blumenthal D. Public roles of US physicians: community participation, political involvement, and collective advocacy. JAMA. 2006; 296(20):2467-75. [PMID: 17119143]
  • Liggett A, Sharma M, Nakamura Y, Villar R, Selwyn P. Results of a voter registration project at 2 family medicine residency clinics in the Bronx, New York. Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12(5):466-9. [PMID: 25354411]
  • Luft LM. The essential role of physician as advocate: how and why we pass it on. Can Med Educ J. 2017; 8(3):e109-16. [PMID: 29098052]
  • Milligan M, Jones D. Voting and the Role of Physicians. Acad Med. 2017; 92(9):1220-1. [PMID: 28857917]
  • Okwerekwu JA, McKenzie JB, Yates KA, Sorrentino RM, Friedman SH. Voting by People with Mental Illness. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018; [PMID: 30381392]
  • Sund R, Lahtinen H, Wass H, Mattila M, Martikainen P. How voter turnout varies between different chronic conditions? A population-based register study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017; 71(5):475-9. [PMID: 27965314]

Back to the July 2019 issue of ACP IMpact