Search Results for ""

List of Sessions - Hospital Med 100

Over 100 hours of high-yield recorded sessions Order Now Alphabetical by Title A New Era in Sickle Cell Disease Speaker: Chancellor Donald, MD

ACP Hospital Med 100 Group Discounts Now Available

Gather your crew! Share the savings! Save 10% with your group of 10 or more physicians.

ACP Hospital Med 100

State-of-the-art lectures curated for your educational needsACP’s Hospital Med 100 recordings package is a comprehensive library of on-demand audio/video sessions tailored to meet the demanding needs of hospital medicine physicians.

List of Sessions - ACP CME 175

Over 175 hours of high-yield recorded sessions Order ACP CME 175

ACP CME 175 Lectures

Learn at your own pace with a massive library of over 175 hours of recorded CME lectures and sessions from Internal Medicine Meeting 2024. Read more now.

ACP CME 170

ACP's Internal Medicine Meeting 2022 was held in April but the CME 170 is here for those who could not attend the live meeting & for Premium Access registrants.

List of Sessions - ACP CME 165

Over 165 hours of high-yield recorded sessions Order ACP CME 165 Alphabetical by Title The 5 Ms: Five Simple Words to Guide the Care of Complex Older Adults Speaker: Mary Tinetti, MD

ACP CME 165

Learn at your own pace with a massive library of more than 165 hours of high-yield recorded sessions from Internal Medicine Meeting 2025.

ACP CME 160

ACP's Internal Medicine Meeting 2023 was held in April but the CME 160 is here for those who could not attend the live meeting & for Premium Access registrants.

2025 Internal Medicine Recordings – Earn CME/MOC | ACP

Watch ACP’s 2025 Internal Medicine Meeting recordings anytime. Earn up to 7.25 CME & MOC credits per course and learn anytime on any device.

These Annals of Internal Medicine results only contain recent articles.

Facilitating Shared Decision Making Among Black Patients at Risk for Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 176, No 5

Background: Racial disparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation are multifactorial and are partly explained by higher refusal rates. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a video decision support tool for Black patients eligible for an ICD. Design: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted between September 2016 and April 2020. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02819973) Setting: Fourteen academic and community-based electrophysiology clinics in the United States. Participants: Black adults with heart failure who were eligible for a primary prevention ICD. Intervention: An encounter-based video decision support tool or usual care. Measurements: The primary outcome was the decision regarding ICD implantation. Additional outcomes included patient knowledge, decisional conflict, ICD implantation within 90 days, the effect of racial concordance on outcomes, and the time patients spent with clinicians. Results: Of the 330 randomly assigned patients, 311 contributed data for the primary outcome. Among those randomly assigned to the video group, assent to ICD implantation was 58.6% compared with 59.4% in the usual care group (difference, −0.8 percentage point [95% CI, −13.2 to 11.1 percentage points]). Compared with usual care, participants in the video group had a higher mean knowledge score (difference, 0.7 [CI, 0.2 to 1.1]) and a similar decisional conflict score (difference, −2.6 [CI, −5.7 to 0.4]). The ICD implantation rate within 90 days was 65.7%, with no differences by intervention. Participants randomly assigned to the video group spent less time with their clinician than those in the usual care group (mean, 22.1 vs. 27.0 minutes; difference, −4.9 minutes [CI, −9.4 to −0.3 minutes]). Racial concordance between video and study participants did not affect study outcomes. Limitation: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services implemented a requirement for shared decision making for ICD implantation during the study. Conclusion: A video-based decision support tool increased patient knowledge but did not increase assent to ICD implantation. Primary Funding Source: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.

The Use of Opioids in the Management of Chronic Pain: Synopsis of the 2022 Updated U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline

Description: In May 2022, leadership within the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) approved a joint clinical practice guideline for the use of opioids when managing chronic pain. This synopsis summarizes the recommendations that the authors believe are the most important to highlight. Methods: In December 2020, the VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Work Group assembled a team to update the 2017 VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain. The guideline development team included clinical stakeholders and conformed to the National Academy of Medicine's tenets for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. The guideline team developed key questions to guide a systematic evidence review that was done by an independent third party and distilled 20 recommendations for care using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The guideline team also created 3 one-page algorithms to help guide clinical decision making. This synopsis presents the recommendations and highlights selected recommendations on the basis of clinical relevance. Recommendations: This guideline is intended for clinicians who may be considering opioid therapy to manage patients with chronic pain. This synopsis reviews updated recommendations for the initiation and continuation of opioid therapy; dose, duration, and taper of opioids; screening, assessment, and evaluation; and risk mitigation. New additions are highlighted, including recommendations about the use of buprenorphine instead of full agonist opioids; assessing for behavioral health conditions and factors associated with higher risk for harm, such as pain catastrophizing; and the use of pain and opioid education to reduce the risk for prolonged opioid use for postsurgical pain.

How Would You Manage This Patient With Chronic Insomnia?: Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 175, No 12

Insomnia, which is characterized by persistent sleep difficulties in association with daytime dysfunction, is a common concern in clinical practice. Chronic insomnia disorder is defined as symptoms that occur at least 3 times per week and persist for at least 3 months. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) published recent guidelines on behavioral and psychological treatment as well as pharmacologic therapy for chronic insomnia disorder. Regarding behavioral and psychological approaches, the only intervention strongly recommended was multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Regarding pharmacologic treatment, the AASM, based on weak evidence, suggested a limited number of medications that might be useful and others that probably are not. Here, 2 clinicians with expertise in sleep disorders—one a clinical psychologist and the other a physician—debate the management of a patient with chronic insomnia who has been treated with medications. They discuss the role of behavioral and psychological interventions and pharmacologic therapy for chronic insomnia and how the primary care practitioner should approach such a patient.

Primary Occurrence of Cardiovascular Events After Adding Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors or Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Compared With Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Cohort Study in Veterans With Diabetes

Background: The effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in preventing major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is uncertain for those without preexisting cardiovascular disease. Objective: To test the hypothesis that MACE incidence was lower with the addition of GLP1RA or SGLT2i compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) for primary cardiovascular prevention. Design: Retrospective cohort study of U.S. veterans from 2001 to 2019. Setting: Veterans aged 18 years or older receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration, with data linkage to Medicare, Medicaid, and the National Death Index. Patients: Veterans adding GLP1RA, SGLT2i, or DPP4i onto metformin, sulfonylurea, or insulin treatment alone or in combination. Episodes were stratified by history of cardiovascular disease. Measurements: Study outcomes were MACE (acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death) and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Cox models compared the outcome between medication groups using pairwise comparisons in a weighted cohort adjusted for covariates. Results: The cohort included 28 759 GLP1RA versus 28 628 DPP4i weighted pairs and 21 200 SGLT2i versus 21 170 DPP4i weighted pairs. Median age was 67 years, and diabetes duration was 8.5 years. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists were associated with lower MACE and HF versus DPP4i (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94]), yielding an adjusted risk difference (aRD) of 3.2 events (CI, 1.1 to 5.0) per 1000 person-years. Sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors were not associated with MACE and HF (aHR, 0.91 [CI, 0.78 to 1.08]; aRD, 1.28 [−1.12 to 3.32]) compared with DPP4i. Limitation: Residual confounding; use of DPP4i, GLP1RA, and SGLT2i as first-line therapies were not examined. Conclusion: The addition of GLP1RA was associated with primary reductions of MACE and HF hospitalization compared with DPP4i use; SGLT2i addition was not associated with primary MACE prevention. Primary Funding Source: VA Clinical Science Research and Development and supported in part by the Centers for Diabetes Translation Research.

Cardiac Arrest During Delivery Hospitalization: A Cohort Study: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 176, No 4

Background: Estimates of cardiac arrest occurring during delivery guide evidence-based strategies to reduce pregnancy-related death. Objective: To investigate rate of, maternal characteristics associated with, and survival after cardiac arrest during delivery hospitalization. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: U.S. acute care hospitals, 2017 to 2019. Participants: Delivery hospitalizations among women aged 12 to 55 years included in the National Inpatient Sample database. Measurements: Delivery hospitalizations, cardiac arrest, underlying medical conditions, obstetric outcomes, and severe maternal complications were identified using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification. Survival to hospital discharge was based on discharge disposition. Results: Among 10 921 784 U.S. delivery hospitalizations, the cardiac arrest rate was 13.4 per 100 000. Of the 1465 patients who had cardiac arrest, 68.6% (95% CI, 63.2% to 74.0%) survived to hospital discharge. Cardiac arrest was more common among patients who were older, were non-Hispanic Black, had Medicare or Medicaid, or had underlying medical conditions. Acute respiratory distress syndrome was the most common co-occurring diagnosis (56.0% [CI, 50.2% to 61.7%]). Among co-occurring procedures or interventions examined, mechanical ventilation was the most common (53.2% [CI, 47.5% to 59.0%]). The rate of survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest was lower with co-occurring disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) without or with transfusion (50.0% [CI, 35.8% to 64.2%] or 54.3% [CI, 39.2% to 69.5%], respectively). Limitations: Cardiac arrests occurring outside delivery hospitalizations were not included. The temporality of arrest relative to the delivery or other maternal complications is unknown. Data do not distinguish cause of cardiac arrest, such as pregnancy-related complications or other underlying causes among pregnant women. Conclusion: Cardiac arrest was observed in approximately 1 in 9000 delivery hospitalizations, among which nearly 7 in 10 women survived to hospital discharge. Survival was lowest during hospitalizations with co-occurring DIC. Primary Funding Source: None.