Letter to Department of Labor Regarding the Association Health Plans Proposed Rule

Letter to Congressional Leaders from Primary Care Partner Organizations re Medicare PFS Efficiency Adjustment

Letter to House and Senate Leaders Opposing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

Joint Letters to Congress and the President About the Health Impacts of the Partial Federal Government Shutdown

Joint Letter to CMS re Prior Authorization and Step Therapy for Part B Drugs in Medicare Advantage

Sign-On Letter to CMS Requesting Delay of 2019 MSSP Application Deadline

Joint Letter to Congressional Appropriators Supporting Funding for the NIH

Letter of support for S. 2695, the Ensuring Access to Primary Care for Women & Children Act from internal medicine and related subspecialties

Letter to Senate regarding the Food and Drug Administration's authority to regulate premium cigars, electronic nicotine delivery systems, and other tobacco products

Letter Opposing Restricting Federal Funds Based on Setting

Concentration of Potentially Preventable Spending Among High-Cost Medicare Subpopulations: An Observational Study: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 167, No 10

Background: Little is known about whether potentially preventable spending is concentrated among a subset of high-cost Medicare beneficiaries. Objective: To determine the proportion of total spending that is potentially preventable across distinct subpopulations of high-cost Medicare beneficiaries. Design: Beneficiaries in the highest 10% of total standardized individual spending were defined as “high-cost” patients, using a 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2012. The following 6 subpopulations were defined using a claims-based algorithm: nonelderly disabled, frail elderly, major complex chronic, minor complex chronic, simple chronic, and relatively healthy. Potentially preventable spending was calculated by summing costs for avoidable emergency department visits using the Billings algorithm plus inpatient and associated 30-day postacute costs for ambulatory care–sensitive conditions (ACSCs). The amount and proportion of potentially preventable spending were then compared across the high-cost subpopulations and by individual ACSCs. Setting: Medicare. Participants: 6 112 450 Medicare beneficiaries. Measurements: Proportion of spending deemed potentially preventable. Results: In 2012, 4.8% of Medicare spending was potentially preventable, of which 73.8% was incurred by high-cost patients. Despite making up only 4% of the Medicare population, high-cost frail elderly persons accounted for 43.9% of total potentially preventable spending ($6593 per person). High-cost nonelderly disabled persons accounted for 14.8% of potentially preventable spending ($3421 per person) and the major complex chronic group for 11.2% ($3327 per person). Frail elderly persons accounted for most spending related to admissions for urinary tract infections, dehydration, heart failure, and bacterial pneumonia. Limitation: Potential misclassification in the identification of preventable spending and lack of detailed clinical data in administrative claims. Conclusion: Potentially preventable spending varied across Medicare subpopulations, with the majority concentrated among frail elderly persons. Primary Funding Source: The Commonwealth Fund.

Functional Impairment and Decline in Middle Age: A Cohort Study: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 167, No 11

Background: Difficulties with daily functioning are common in middle-aged adults. However, little is known about the epidemiology or clinical course of these problems, including the extent to which they share common features with functional impairment in older adults. Objective: To determine the epidemiology and clinical course of functional impairment and decline in middle age. Design: Cohort study. Setting: The Health and Retirement Study. Participants: 6874 community-dwelling adults aged 50 to 56 years who did not have functional impairment at enrollment. Measurements: Impairment in activities of daily living (ADLs), defined as self-reported difficulty performing 1 or more ADLs, assessed every 2 years for a maximum follow-up of 20 years, and impairment in instrumental ADLs (IADLs), defined similarly. Data were analyzed by using multistate models that estimate probabilities of different outcomes. Results: Impairment in ADLs developed in 22% of participants aged 50 to 64 years, in whom further functional transitions were common. Two years after the initial impairment, 4% (95% CI, 3% to 5%) of participants had died, 9% (CI, 8% to 11%) had further ADL decline, 50% (CI, 48% to 52%) had persistent impairment, and 37% (CI, 35% to 39%) had recovered independence. In the 10 years after the initial impairment, 16% (CI, 14% to 18%) had 1 or more episodes of functional decline and 28% (CI, 26% to 30%) recovered from their initial impairment and remained independent throughout this period. The pattern of findings was similar for IADLs. Limitation: Functional status was self-reported. Conclusion: Functional impairment and decline are common in middle age, as are transitions from impairment to independence and back again. Because functional decline in older adults has similar features, current interventions used for prevention in older adults may hold promise for those in middle age. Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Aging and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through the University of California, San Francisco, Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.

Professionalism Charter Provides Guidance to Health Care Organizations in These Troubled Times

A Tale of Two Countries: How I Saw More Patients With More Joy in Internal Medicine Practice

Development of a Research Agenda to Identify Evidence-Based Strategies to Improve Physician Wellness and Reduce Burnout

Making the Most of Simplified Sleep Apnea Testing

Accepting the Existence of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis

Should We Prescribe Antibiotics to This Patient With Persistent Upper Respiratory Symptoms?: Grand Rounds Discussion From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 166, No 3

The American College of Physicians (ACP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently published advice for high-value care on the appropriate use of antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections. They conducted a narrative literature review of evidence for antibiotic use in this setting that included recent clinical guidelines from professional societies supplemented by randomized, controlled trials; meta-analyses; and systematic reviews. They concluded that clinicians should reserve antibiotic treatment for acute rhinosinusitis in patients with persistent symptoms for more than 10 days, high fever and purulent nasal discharge or facial pain lasting for at least 3 consecutive days, or worsening symptoms after a typical viral illness that lasted 5 days and had initially improved (“double-sickening”). In this Grand Rounds, 2 prominent clinicians debate whether to initiate antibiotic treatment in a 62-year-old man with a history of recurrent sinusitis who presents with persistent upper respiratory symptoms. They review the data on which the ACP/CDC recommendations are based and discuss the potential benefits and risks, as well as the challenges and controversies, of prescribing antibiotic therapy in this setting.

Promoting Appropriate Use of Cardiac Imaging: No Longer an Academic Exercise

Safety-Net Hospitals, Neighborhood Disadvantage, and Readmissions Under Maryland's All-Payer Program: An Observational Study: Annals of Internal Medicine: Vol 171, No 2

Background: Safety-net hospitals have higher-than-expected readmission rates. The relative roles of the mean disadvantage of neighborhoods the hospitals serve and the disadvantage of individual patients in predicting a patient's readmission are unclear. Objective: To examine the independent contributions of the patient's neighborhood and the hospital's service area to risk for 30-day readmission. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Maryland. Participants: All Maryland residents discharged from a Maryland hospital in 2015. Measurements: Predictors included the disadvantage of neighborhoods for each Maryland resident (area disadvantage index) and the mean disadvantage of each hospital's discharged patients (safety-net index). The primary outcome was unplanned 30-day hospital readmission. Generalized estimating equations and marginal modeling were used to estimate readmission rates. Results were adjusted for clinical readmission risk. Results: 13.4% of discharged patients were readmitted within 30 days. Patients living in neighborhoods at the 90th percentile of disadvantage had a readmission rate of 14.1% (95% CI, 13.6% to 14.5%) compared with 12.5% (CI, 11.8% to 13.2%) for similar patients living in neighborhoods at the 10th percentile. Patients discharged from hospitals at the 90th percentile of safety-net status had a readmission rate of 14.8% (CI, 13.4% to 16.1%) compared with 11.6% (CI, 10.5% to 12.7%) for similar patients discharged from hospitals at the 10th percentile of safety-net status. The association of readmission risk with the hospital's safety-net index was approximately twice the observed association with the patient's neighborhood disadvantage status. Limitations: Generalizability outside Maryland is unknown. Confounding may be present. Conclusion: In Maryland, residing in a disadvantaged neighborhood and being discharged from a hospital serving a large proportion of disadvantaged neighborhoods are independently associated with increased risk for readmission. Primary Funding Source: National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission.