You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Become a Fellow
ACP offers a number of resources to help members make sense of the MOC requirements and earn points.
Understanding MOC Requirements
Earn MOC points
The most comprehensive meeting in Internal Medicine.
April 11-13, 2019
Internal Medicine Meeting 2019
Prepare for the Certification and Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
Exam with an ACP review course.
Board Certification Review Courses
MOC Exam Prep Courses
Treating a patient? Researching a topic? Get answers now.
Visit AnnalsLearn More
Visit MKSAP 18Learn More
Visit DynaMed Plus
Ensure payment and avoid policy violations. Plus, new resources to help you navigate the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA).
Access helpful forms developed by a variety of sources for patient charts, logs, information sheets, office signs, and use by practice administration.
ACP advocates on behalf on internists and their patients on a number of timely issues. Learn about where ACP stands on the following areas:
© Copyright 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved. 190 North Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572
Toll Free: (800) 523.1546 · Local: (215) 351.2400
Justin R. Abbatemarco, University of South Florida College of
Medicine, Class of 2015
This project evaluated Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology in
changing opioid prescribing practice to comply with state
legislation while monitoring its effect on aberrant behaviors.
National guidelines and new regulations were condensed into an
'opioid bundle' which included a treatment agreement, informed
consent, drug monitoring plan and one time look up in the Florida
Prescription drug database. PDSA methodology was utilized to
implement the 'opioid bundle' and improve individual provider
adherence with new regulations. Adult patients with an ICD-9 code
of muscular or neuropathic pain who had been prescribed more than
90 days of opioid therapy within the General Internal Medicine
Department of the University of South Florida were included in the
project. Five PDSA cycles were conducted to improve adherence with
the 'opioid bundle'. The PDSA cycles were initiated sequentially to
allow for continuous assessment and improvement. Aberrant
behaviors, which included early refills, dose escalation,
unexpected results on urine drug screens and multiple prescribing
providers, were also tracked in all patients included in the study.
Following each PDSA cycle, the success of implementation of the
'opioid bundle' and the presence of aberrant behaviors was assessed
through chart review. A p control chart was used to track the
'opioid bundle' implementation after each PDSA cycle. To determine
the effect of the 'opioid bundle' on aberrant behaviors, the
results were compared before and after implementation of the
'opioid bundle' utilizing a Mann-Whitney test.
A total of 97 chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) patients were included
in the analysis. After five PDSA cycles, the bundle was implemented
in 60.0% of CNCP patients. Aberrant behavior was observed in 52%
(25/48) of CNCP patients pre-bundle and 16% (8/49) of CNCP patients
post-bundle. There was not a statistical difference in early
refills (p=0.3920) or unexpected results in urine drug screen
(p=0.3046) but there were statistically significant decreases in
dose escalation (p=0.0462) and patients with more than one opioid
The PDSA methodology enabled implementation of the 'opioid bundle'
and offered a practical model for small, outpatient clinics to
implement changes. This project required minimal resources and the
results are directly applicable to other outpatient clinics needing
to change opioid prescribing practice. Though aberrant behavior
decreased, it is difficult to conclude this was solely due to the
Back to May
2013 Issue of IMpact