You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Become a Fellow
ACP offers a number of resources to help members make sense of the MOC requirements and earn points.
Understanding MOC Requirements
Earn MOC points
The most comprehensive meeting in Internal Medicine.
April 11-13, 2019
Internal Medicine Meeting 2019
Prepare for the Certification and Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
Exam with an ACP review course.
Board Certification Review Courses
MOC Exam Prep Courses
Treating a patient? Researching a topic? Get answers now.
Visit AnnalsLearn More
Visit MKSAP 18Learn More
Visit DynaMed Plus
Ensure payment and avoid policy violations. Plus, new resources to help you navigate the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA).
Access helpful forms developed by a variety of sources for patient charts, logs, information sheets, office signs, and use by practice administration.
ACP advocates on behalf on internists and their patients on a number of timely issues. Learn about where ACP stands on the following areas:
© Copyright 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved. 190 North Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572
Toll Free: (800) 523.1546 · Local: (215) 351.2400
Authors: Rachel Lynn Orler,B.A.; University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Ateev Mehrotra, M.D., M.P.H., M.S.;
University of Pittsburgh Division of General Internal Medicine;
RAND Health, Pittsburgh
As evidenced by pay-for-performance incentives and physician report
cards, there is a growing interest in identifying high quality
physicians. However, looking only at individual quality leaves an
important corollary unaddressed: What kinds of physicians provide
the best care? Previous studies on this question have been limited
by the number of physicians, available physician characteristics,
or scope of quality metrics. In this study we examined the
relationship between individual physician characteristics and
healthcare quality using over one hundred quality indicators across
a large sample of physicians in Massachusetts.
The study sample was comprised of 13,788 active Massachusetts
physicians in 27 common specialties. Quality of care was measured
using the RAND claims-based QA Toolkit of 131 indicators for 21
conditions. Examples of quality metrics included such guidelines as
having INR checked every three months for atrial fibrillation
patients on warfarin or screening pregnant patients for anemia at
their first prenatal visit. The basis of the quality measurement
was a database of de-identified insurance claims for 1.13 million
adult patients continuously enrolled in one of the four major
Massachusetts health plans in 2004-05. The following physician
characteristics were obtained from the Massachusetts Board of
Registration: gender, medical school attended, years in practice,
board certification status, and disciplinary and malpractice
information. Quality of medical school was measured by US News and
World Report rankings of the physician's medical school. Of the
12,781 active physicians, 10,768(84.25%) were linked and had
complete demographic and quality profiles. We evaluated the
univariate and multivariate relationship between physician
characteristics and overall, condition-type, and specialty-type
The overall quality profile was 68.7% across the physicians. The
only physician characteristics associated with significantly higher
overall quality profiles were gender (female physicians 1.45%
higher quality profile than male physicians), board certification
status (board certified physicians 2.56% higher quality profile
than non-certified physicians), and malpractice claims status
(those with out claims 1.02% higher quality profile than those with
claims against them). There was significant variation in the
relationship between physician characteristics and quality profiles
broken down by condition type or physician specialty type. For
example, while a significant negative association was found between
years of experience and quality for primary care specialties, a
significant positive association was found between quality and
experience for surgical specialties. Conclusion: Few physician
characteristics were consistently associated with higher quality
across conditions. Many physician characteristics that seem
naturally linked to high or low quality care are not necessarily as
clearly predictive as assumed.
Back to May
2010 Issue of IMpact