You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.
Become a Fellow
ACP offers a number of resources to help members make sense of the MOC requirements and earn points.
Understanding MOC Requirements
Earn MOC points
The most comprehensive meeting in Internal Medicine.
April 11-13, 2019
Internal Medicine Meeting 2019
Prepare for the Certification and Maintenance of Certification (MOC)
Exam with an ACP review course.
Board Certification Review Courses
MOC Exam Prep Courses
Treating a patient? Researching a topic? Get answers now.
Visit AnnalsLearn More
Visit MKSAP 18
Visit DynaMed Plus
Ensure payment and avoid policy violations. Plus, new resources to help you navigate the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA).
Access helpful forms developed by a variety of sources for patient charts, logs, information sheets, office signs, and use by practice administration.
ACP advocates on behalf on internists and their patients on a number of timely issues. Learn about where ACP stands on the following areas:
© Copyright 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved. 190 North Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572
Toll Free: (800) 523.1546 · Local: (215) 351.2400
Aug. 10, 2018 (ACP) – Drafts of two key Medicare policies for 2019 – the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and the Quality Payment Program – reflect progress, but still need more work to fully meet the needs of physicians and patients, according to the American College of Physicians.
“We appreciate the fact that Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is working to lessen the burdens of administrative requirements, such as documentation associated with evaluation-and-management (E/M) services,” said Brian Outland, ACP's director of regulatory affairs. “But we want to make sure the policies for 2019 don't adversely impact physicians who care for chronically ill and sick patients.”
The two policies are updated each year, and the review process for ACP and other organizations begins in the summer when CMS distributes draft regulations. The policies are expected to be finalized by November.
On the positive side, ACP is pleased with certain fee schedule proposals, including the following:
However, ACP is concerned about the proposed establishment of a single base payment level that could adversely affect internal medicine specialists and subspecialists who see chronically ill patients and must spend extra amounts of time with them.
Under the proposal, all level 2 to 5 office-based and outpatient E/M visits would be consolidated into base payment levels – one for new patients, and one for established patients.
According to Outland, the established patient rate would be $93 under the proposal, plus an add-on that would bring the total to about $98 and $107 respectively for primary care physicians or specialists. CMS will add $5 to each office visit performed for primary care purposes and proposes to add $14 to each office visits performed by the specialties. That's in contrast to the current system, in which payments range from $48 to $148, depending on the complexity of the patient visit.
As Dr. Ana María López, ACP's president, explained: “We acknowledge the potential benefit of simplifying billing and the associated documentation of E/M services. ACP will be assessing whether this change will have the unintended impact of undervaluing the work associated with caring for more complex and frail patients.”
“Reimbursing the most complex E/M services to such patients at the same flat level as healthier patients with less complex problems could undervalue the physician skills and training needed to care for such patients,” she said.
Outland put it this way: “They're offering to reduce administrative burden, but it's coupled with lower payment. We're trying to uncouple this and get it to work.”
As for the Quality Payment Program, ACP is pleased that CMS wants to change aspects of the program in line with what the College has recommended. For instance:
ACP is also pleased that CMS wants to remove low-value quality measures, a move that reflects recommendations by ACP and its Performance Measurement Committee.
However, ACP also believes that CMS can do more to reduce the burdens and complexities of MIPS. It would like CMS to streamline MIPS requirements and scoring and reduce the reporting burden by establishing a minimum 90-day reporting period for all performance categories, and potentially reduce the total number of quality measures required to be reported.
ACP also opposes increasing the weight of the Cost Category to 15 percent in the same year that eight new measures would be counted for the first time.
Finally, ACP is concerned about the proposal to require use of 2015 Edition Certified EHR Technology in 2019.
The College urges CMS to allow at least six months for vendors and physicians to implement system upgrades in order to meet this requirement if implemented. In addition, ACP wants CMS to focus on mitigating the costs of this process, especially for small practices.
“While both the proposed fee schedule and the proposed QPP rules have changes that we like, there are some big areas for improvement,” said Outland. “ACP is working on a more detailed analysis of both rules and will provide our feedback to CMS by the beginning of September.”
More detail on the draft proposals is available from fact sheets prepared by CMS – one on the Physician Fee Schedule and one on the Quality Payment Program.
Back to the August 10, 2018 issue of ACP Advocate