You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

You are using an outdated browser.

To ensure optimal security, this website will soon be unavailable on this browser. Please upgrade your browser to allow continued use of ACP websites.

Controlling High Blood Pressure

Percentage of patients 18-85 years of age who had a diagnosis of hypertension and whose blood pressure was adequately controlled (<140/90mmHg) during the measurement period.

Date Reviewed: November 19, 2017

Measure Info

MIPS 236NQF 0018CMS 236NQF EndorsedCQMC Core Measure
Measure Type: 
Outcome
Measure Steward: 
National Committee for Quality Assurance
Clinical Topic Area: 
Hypertension

Care Setting: 
Outpatient
Data Source: 
Claims
CMS Web Interface
Electronic Health Records
Paper Medical Records
Registry

ACP does not support QPP measure 236: “Controlling High Blood Pressure.” Implementation may result in measurable and meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes and there is a known performance gap in the area of blood pressure control. However, while the specifications for the measure under consideration for NQF-endorsement align with American College of Physicians (ACP) and the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC-8) recommendations on controlling BP in patients aged 18-85 years of age with and without a diagnosis of diabetes, the MIPS measure specifications do not stratify patients into well-defined risk groups (i.e., comorbid disease diagnosis). The American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline states that there is no difference in outcomes between strict blood pressure control and standard blood pressure control (128-133 mmHg vs. 134-141 mmHg systolic, and 75-81 mmHg vs. 81-87 mmHg diastolic). Furthermore, the numerator specifications define office measurements as the preferred monitoring method, while home monitoring is the preferred method to assess for adequately controlled BP. We suggest the developers update the numerator specifications to include an average of several measurement results. Doing so would likely increase the accuracy of the measurement results and reduce the potential for overtreatment. Finally, the measure was created to assess system-level performance where information systems include multiple readings from a variety of settings. The measure may not be an appropriate accountability measure for individual clinicians who do not have access to all BP measurement results.

*Note: PMC approves the specifications included in the updated measure proposed for NQF endorsement. If NQF approves the proposed measure updates, we suggest CMS adopt the updated measure.

As part of an ongoing effort to improve user experience, we have made some updates to the Performance Measures section of ACP. Tell us what you think!