You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

You are using an outdated browser.

To ensure optimal security, this website will soon be unavailable on this browser. Please upgrade your browser to allow continued use of ACP websites.

Cardiac Stress Imaging Not Meeting Appropriate Use Criteria: Testing in Asymptomatic, Low-Risk Surgery Patients

Percentage of all stress single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), stress echocardiogram (ECHO), cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) performed in asymptomatic, low coronary heart disease (CHD) risk patients 18 years and older for initial detection and risk assessment.

Date Reviewed: November 19, 2017

Measure Info

MIPS 324NQF 0672CMS 324NQF Endorsed
Measure Type: 
Efficiency
Measure Steward: 
American College of Cardiology
Clinical Topic Area: 
Cardiac Stress Imaging

Care Setting: 
Outpatient
Data Source: 
Registry

ACP does not support QPP measure 324: "Cardiac Stress Imaging Not Meeting Appropriate Use Criteria: Testing in Asymptomatic, Low-Risk Patients" because the numerator is not specified for individual clinician use and the measure does not specify a standardized approach to risk assessment. As written, the numerator relies on the individual clinician’s ability to appropriately document level of risk. Measure developers recognize the reliability of certain assessment tools (e.g., Framingham Risk Calculation) to accurately assess level of risk in asymptomatic patients; however, developers also recognize the significant clinician burden associated with these data collection tools, and therefore, suggest clinicians attest to the accuracy of their estimation by submission. A stronger measure may specify a more systematic approach to risk assessment. Furthermore, the developers should consider revising the numerator specifications to include “healthy, low-risk patients.” While a performance gap exists to form the basis of the measure and implementation will likely promote appropriate use of cardiac stress imaging in low- risk patients, the measure is currently designed evaluate performance at the cardiac lab level, not at the level of the individual clinician.