ACP-ASIM Pressroom
Health Care Issues 2001: Legislative Report Card
Presented by the California Chapter, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine (115,000 internists with 10,000 providing care for California)
February 6, 2001
|
ISSUE |
SPECIFICS |
Year 2000 GRADE |
Comments |
|
Access to care |
1.Expanding Childrens Health Initiative Program (CHIP) |
C+ |
Attempts to simplify enrollment but well short of goal Goal: All eligible children and their parents up to 250% of federal poverty level. |
|
2.CHIP extended to parents |
B |
Plans to use surplus funds to expand eligibility Goal: Subsidize enrollment in private non-MediCal plans |
|
|
3. Prevent loss of federal funds for CHIP |
A |
Timely action preserves funds otherwise lost Goal: Expand program by requiring the state to apply for the maximum amount of available federal funds. |
|
|
4. MediCal physician fee schedule |
B |
First effort in a decade; but state still 44th lowest reimbursement rate in nation; physician participation in program remains threatened Goal: 80% of Medicare fee schedule as floor. This will result in more physicians being willing to participate in program. |
|
|
Public Health |
1. Tobacco funds |
B |
For the 2001 budget, Davis proposed spending $468 million from the tobacco settlement against tobacco companies on health-related programs. Previously, Davis said the settlement money should simply be dumped into the state's general fund with no strings attached. Goal: Use funds exclusively for healthcare programs. |
|
2. Elder abuse reporting |
D |
Well intended but creates dangerous potential of physician criminal liability Goal: Revise law to place physician reporting responsibility more in line with the role of the physician in patient care — e.g., reporting those instances of abuse involving the health status of the patient. |
|
Managed care |
1. Medical group viability |
D |
Epidemic of contracting group bankruptcies due to pervasive under funding; health plans not held responsible for services provided Goal: Actuarially sound capitation; reasonable arbitration/negotiation ability (e.g. AB32 -Richman) |
|
2. Actuarially sound capitation |
D- |
Market share allows health plans to offer capitation rates which are below the cost to provide services. Goal: Legislation to require actuarially sound capitation rates. |
|
|
3. Independent review of health plan denials of care |
A |
New law in effect 2001 allows patient access to review of care denial Goal: Implement in patient-friendly way with desired results, consumer confidence. |
|
|
4. Access to fee schedule information |
D- |
Continued widespread health plan abuse of providers, unfair contracting and fee changes Goal: Enforceable legislation and/or regulations with teeth |
|
|
5. Medical Director Liability |
D- |
Out of state medical directors of health plans doing business in California are not held liable for making treatment decisions. Goal: Require licensure by the Medical Board of California for medical directors. |
|
|
State Budget Priorities |
1. Funding for healthcare programs |
C |
Increased spending proposed for FY 2001-need to maintain increased funding proposed by Governor of $468 million in tobacco settlement money earmarked to expand health care programs including prostate and breast cancer treatment for the uninsured. Increased spending for Medi-Cal, California's health care program for the poor, will increase by $204 million to $9.5 billion. Goal: Support Governor’s proposed budget for healthcare. |
Note: Grades are assigned by Board of Trustees of the California Chapter, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine January 2001
A: Excellent initiative with good prospects for productive implementation
B: Useful initiative but requires thoughtful implementation for success
C: Some progress but requires expansion, better focus or appropriate implementation
D: Shows lack of activity, inappropriate focus or lacks practicality, can’t be implemented
D-: In urgent need of being addressed



