Medicare and Medicaid archives: Documentation and coding
ACP-ASIM comments on revised E/M guidelines (October 2000)
College opposes reduction in critical care codes (February 2000)
New E/M framework is better, but other options needed (November 1999)
College comments on documentation guidelines (January 1999)
HCFA promises to deliver simplified E/M guidelines Still at issue: whether numerical formulas are necessary to verify physician compliance (November 1998)
Officials: get involved with E/M guidelines (September 1998)
AMA delegates: Revise E/M guidelines (July-August 1998)
Why you still need to pay attention to E/M guidelines If you don't worry about HCFA's documentation rules, you may be setting yourself up for trouble (June 1998)
What's wrong with new E/M rules? Some fear that the guidelines will be used to unfairly punish doctors (April 1998)
ACP will work to modify 'punitive' E/M guidelines (February 1998)
New HCFA guidelines delayed for six months (January 1998)
Using the new E/M documentation guidelines, Part II This month: documenting the physical exam and complexity of medical decision-making (December 1997)
HCFA proposes increase for E/M services for 1997 (June 1996)
HCFA changes rules for ICD-9 coding (January 1996)
HCFA to change 87,000 CPT coding combinations (December 1995)
Contact ACP Internist
Send comments to ACP Internist staff at acpinternist@acponline.org.